Affordance
STR·07 · 7 of 11The perceivable properties of a thing should announce what can be done with it.
documented A named, findable source says this. Why: Gibson 1979 coined it, Norman 1988 imported it, Norman 1999 corrected the drift. All three are citable, which is why the drift is documentable.
The same task, built twice
Both panes below are real interfaces. They respond, they can be got wrong, and each is timed from your first move in it. The times are not a study — two panes, one reader, no controls. They are here to make a difference you can feel into a number you can see, and nothing is recorded or sent anywhere.
Find the control that submits this application, and press it.
Application · step 3 of 3
Six pieces of text. Two are buttons, one is a link, three are labels, and nothing on screen distinguishes them until you hover — which a touch screen does not have.
Application · step 3 of 3
The same six. The button looks pressable, the link looks like a link, and the labels look like labels. Nothing here is decoration; every difference is doing work.
What to watch Your wrong-click count on the left. Norman's later correction is the useful one — what a designer controls is not the affordance but the signifier, the perceivable hint that the affordance is there at all.