i
The Anti-patterns Annex
ANX·03·A01

The Carousel

Flagged on sight documented

The carousel is what a homepage does instead of making a decision. Five stakeholders, five banners, one rotating frame — the conflict resolved by hiding four of the five messages at any moment and animating the evidence. The pattern's popularity is entirely internal: it solves a meeting, not a user need.

The record is unusually one-sided: interaction concentrates overwhelmingly on the first slide, auto-rotation moves content while people are reading it (an accessibility failure on its own — WCAG's pause-stop-hide criterion exists substantially because of this pattern), and banner-blindness treats the whole region as an ad. The Institute flags it on sight; the burden of proof sits with the carousel.

slide 1 of 5 where the clicks go slides 2–5
FIG 03·A01 — the audience never turns the page.

Survives only as

  • A user-driven gallery of equivalent items (product photos), swiped by choice, never auto-rotating
  • A browsing shelf where sequence is the content (episode rails) — with full keyboard and pause control

Dies as

  • The homepage hero rotator — the canonical form
  • Any auto-advancing frame containing text someone might be reading
  • A compromise between departments
Principle brokenAttention is spent without consent; motion fights reading — Stairwell: feedback & control.
SourcesNN/g carousel research; Runyon's shouldiuseacarousel lineage; WCAG 2.2.2 pause-stop-hide.
See alsoThe Basement holds its cousins: the hover-menu and the forced tour.

Why documented: The case against is published: interaction concentrates on the first slide, and WCAG 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide exists substantially because of auto-rotation.