The retail bank navigation, read in two markets
HSBC United Kingdom × HSBC Hong Kong
Independent analysis · not commissioned by, or conducted for, HSBC
Source: both public retail websites, as observed July 2026
Method: full navigation reconstruction · link counting · comparative journey mapping
One bank operates six top-level categories in each market. Four are the same. The two it chooses freely are not, and the choice is the whole finding.
The trade-off named
Fixed by the business Discretionary — the two slots each market chooses
View as table
| Category | UK | HK |
|---|---|---|
| Banking | 21% | 26% |
| Borrowing | 23% | 24% |
| Investing | 11% | 17% |
| Insurance | 19% | 14% |
| 5th slot | Wellbeing 16% | Insights 7% |
| 6th slot | Help 10% | Offers 12% |
The two menus, reconstructed
The finest grain this floor reaches: not a description of a navigation but the navigation itself, label by label, as the discretionary slot was found. These are reconstructions of published menus — the labels are the bank's, the grouping is theirs, and nothing here is a live link.
What is absent
Under UK Wellbeing: bereavement support, losing your job, mental health, separation, financial and domestic abuse, support for gambling. There is no equivalent anywhere in the Hong Kong navigation — not buried, absent. And the UK carries no stock screener, no IPOs, no warrants and no live market data. Each market's omissions are as designed as its inclusions.
The same question, walked
Three readers against the menus above, with the information scent recorded at every step. The third is the control: one person, one bank, one mental model, carried across a border.
The FCA’s Consumer Duty (2023) obliges banks to actively support customers in financial difficulty. A regulatory requirement with a visible consequence in the information architecture.
- Homepage strong scent
- Wellbeing strong scent
- Money worries strong scent
- Mortgage payment support strong scent
- Reached after 4 steps
Four clicks, and at no step is she asked to translate her problem into product language. Elevating Wellbeing to a top-level slot is a claim that users in difficulty are a primary user group — regulatory intent turned into architecture.
Retail equity participation in Hong Kong exceeds half of households. Investment is everyday behaviour, and cross-border wealth flows through the Greater Bay Area schemes are routine.
- Home strong scent
- Investing strong scent
- GBA section strong scent
- Wealth Connect strong scent
- Reached after 4 steps
- Home strong scent
- Insights strong scent
- Advanced Investor strong scent
- Investment Views strong scent
- Reached after 4 steps
Two valid routes to adjacent goals — redundancy, which is a feature of an architecture built for a population that already knows the vocabulary. And the mirror of Sarah’s case: this navigation would fail her completely, and was not designed otherwise.
The control case. One person, one bank, one mental model — carried across a border. Nothing about her changes between these two paths except the architecture in front of her.
- Home strong scent
- Investing → Stocks strong scent
- Insights → Views strong scent
- Reached after 3 steps
- Home strong scent
- Investing? — no individual stocks weak scent
- Wellbeing? — irrelevant to her no scent
- Abandoned after 3 steps
Her fluency in Hong Kong was never individual skill; it was alignment between her mental model and the design model. In the United Kingdom that alignment breaks at step two, and no amount of expertise compensates for a structural mismatch. The architecture tells her, without saying it, that she is not the user it was designed for.
The grain lift
- L1 · ElementThe category label. A promise about what lies behind it.
- L2 · ComponentThe mega-menu panel — 155 or 190 links, one drop.
- L3 · GrammarSix slots. Four fixed, two free. The grammar is identical; the vocabulary is not.
- L4 · FlowA customer in arrears in the UK reaches help in two steps. In Hong Kong the path does not exist.
- L5 · SystemOne brand, two theories of what a customer is for.
Standing
Specimens are dated because interfaces change. This reading is true of July 2026 and will be re-counted annually; when the count moves, the page says so rather than quietly becoming false.
Why documented: Both navigations were counted from the public websites on the stated date, and the method is named. Anyone can recount them.